BWC Cybersecurity Overlord ✭✭✭
Reactions
Comments
-
Hi @SonicAdmin80 you can watch my pain over here: --Michael@BWC
-
@EnaBev I recieved a notfication about this, but why does it not show up in the Thread? --Michael@BWC
-
@tabbit it can be found in the Internal Settings --> /cgi-bin/diag --Michael@BWC
-
Still broken in 10.2.1.1 for all who had some hope. --Michael@BWC
-
Hi @Fansa you can disable Interface Trust for the LAN zone if you wanna control traffic between these Interfaces. Without disabling this Option the Firewall does not check the traffic between them. IMHO no need for a new custom Zone, except you have other Interfaces bound to this Zone as well and need the Interfaces trust.…
-
Hi @Fansa ok then, I guess you have Interface trust enabled and having X0:V11 and X0:V12 (or any other Interface) put into the LAN zone? If Interface Trust enabled all the traffic between these Interfaces is allowed and your Block Rule does not catch it. Can you try disabling Interface Trust in the Zone settings for the…
-
In the meantime WiFi 6e is the new minimum to be current, but maybe skipping 6 all along and routing for 7 is a better approach when new products are not released quickly. --Michael@BWC
-
Hi @Fansa if DC and DRC are in the same subnet, the packets between these two Hosts will never touch the Firewall because of subnet routing. --Michael@BWC
-
Hi @gussr16 if we are talking about local users you can ssh into the appliance and do this: no cli pager session show user local This will show you all users, the ones with "no one-time-password" in the configuration do not have OTP enabled. You could extract the same information from the TSR if you don't like to ssh into…
-
@mtbpm SMA = Secure Mobile Access, you did not mentioned if you're trying to connect to a Firewall or SMA Appliance. The Administrator is controlling the ability of the client to store the profile with username or username/password no profile at all. This has to be done on the Firewall or SMA Appliance therefor.…
-
@mtbpm I checked on my system and the credentials are saved. Was using it on Catalina and upgraded to Big Sur last Friday. I checked the Client Settings on the SMA and currently "Allow saving of user name only" is selected, which seems not right. Maybe it's driven by the SMA and got broken in a newer firmware telling the…
-
Just a follow-up, since uninstalling Capture Client no more crashes, just saying. And while we're on it, S1 Agent did not got uninstalled for unknown reason. This usually needs a Passphrase from the S1 backend or a Cleaner Tool. I opened Ticket #43754704 11 Days ago, and Support is not able to solve this simple Request. No…
-
I don't have a NSa / NSsp at hand, are these units affected as well? Shouldn't OFP speeding up the packet flow instead putting some extra latency on it? I asked the same a year ago, so at least it's not new, but to be fair I did not put much effort into this for further investigation :) --Michael@BWC
-
Hi @Udana it's an universal binary, so no Rosetta needed with 5.0.8: SonicWall Mobile Connect: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures: [x86_64:Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64] [arm64:Mach-O 64-bit executable arm64] SonicWall Mobile Connect (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64 SonicWall Mobile…
-
@mquesa macOS 10.13 got abandoned all the way, even if you could pick up a Installer for Capture Client 3.1 it'll work no more because the backend is already switched off or will be shortly. All current versions of SentinelOne do not support 10.13 either and other alternatives for getting a decent Endpoint Protection on…