shiprasahu93

Moderator
Avatar

Join the Conversation

To sign in, use your existing MySonicWall account. To create a free MySonicWall account click "Register".

shiprasahu93 Moderator

Badges (23)

2 Year Anniversary250 Answers250 Likes1 Year Anniversary1,000 Comments100 Answers500 Comments50 Answers25 Answers25 Helpfuls100 Likes100 Comments5 Answers25 LikesWork Out Loud5 Likes5 Helpfuls10 CommentsFirst AnswerName DropperFirst CommentPhotogenic

Comments

  • Yes, I do not remember the exact threshold, but I think if there are only 30 or 15 days left for expiration it shows up there to alert you that a renewal is pending. Usually most of these certs are good for at least year so these messages do not appear if you load them with higher expiration times. I hope that helps!
  • Hello @lschaedle, Welcome to SonicWall community. I remember a similar issue reported some time back. I would suggest testing with the GVC 5.0 version. Please reach out to our support team and they can help you in getting that version. It is not web posted yet and not directly available on mysonicwall.com. Thanks!
  • Hello @Disconnected, Unfortunately, the virtual office portal and NetExtender both use identical port numbers and web connection and that is the reason why we cannot keep one of them disabled while trying to use another. The only difference is the client that is being used to make the connection. You are either using a…
  • Hello @Disconnected, Please check if this certificate is being used for the firewall management. You can navigate to MANAGE | Appliance | Base Settings and under the Web Management Settings section, there would be a Certificate Selection option. Make sure that it also points to the new certificate. Thanks!
  • Hello @FabrizPell, Welcome to SonicWall community. Since the users connecting to the Terminal Service will all use the same IP address of the TS to connect to the internet, it is not a good idea to have SSO agent determine the user logged in to the server. I would suggest bypassing or excluding the Terminal Server IP from…
  • @Darshil, If I use play.google.com specifically in the forbidden list, then it seems to work correctly. Unfortunately, if I use *.google.com, google.com is also getting blocked. So, you can selectively block the sub-domains from google that you would like to block. I am attaching the list of sub-domains from google for…
  • @Darshil, Let me test it out and I will update you. Thanks!
  • Hello @Alberto, Looks like this is for a SMB connection. The reply packet from 10.10.92.200 had all three flags set ACK, RST and FIN which is not right. That is the reason the firewall had to drop this connection. If there were network issues, you can take a look at the KB below: Thanks!
  • Hello @Darshil, I would suggest adding *.google.com to the forbidden list and using the forbidden list to be checked first in the CFS profile. You can specifically mention play.google.com etc in the forbidden list if you want. Without that, google.com if allowed, its sub domains will also be allowed. Thanks!
  • Hello @Alberto, You can visit https://livedemo.sonicwall.com/products/firewalls/entry-level/ and click on the TZ 670 or TZ 570 for SonicOS 7.0. For SonicOSX 7.0, you can visit the NSv 870 at https://livedemo.sonicwall.com/products/firewalls/virtual/ Thanks!
  • Thanks @dakhazm. You have a good day!
  • @Twizz728, The SonicWall can take routing decisions, so no additional router is required. You can either plug the printers directly to the firewall or use a small switch for multiple devices if they need to terminate on the same interface. The IP scheme needs to be separate for this interface and you would need to add…
  • Hello @dakhazm, Welcome to SonicWall community. The Site to Site VPN is not license dependent and is available on all models from TZ, NSa to SM. The firewall that you should use on the branch and HQ locations should be dependent on the Internet speed support, number of users, traffic that the firewall needs to handle etc.…
  • Hello @JohnS, Unfortunately, due to separate hardwares, the handoff between the built in wireless and the access point cannot take place. That is the reason why the the VAP for them are separate and cannot be clubbed together. You can have one SSID on the built-in wireless and another on the AP but not both the SSIDs on…
  • @SEBASTIAN, That does seem weird. Please check the NAT policy's priority on Site A. Let us know how it goes. Thanks!