BWC Cybersecurity Overlord ✭✭✭
Reactions
Comments
-
Well this is one of these threads which got nowhere, SNWL IMHO never addressed this properly. At least Brook does not have to bother anymore and hopefully Fortinet handles this in a different way. --Michael@BWC
-
This is way I asked for the LB status. You can do a real alive check by activating the probing, which can be configured either on the LB group on the tab "Probing" or by member interface and the Physical Monitoring is the Default here. This is usually the problem when you have router or modem attached to your WAN port and…
-
@skunkworks how did you setup your Type of FLB, is it Basic Failover, Ratio, Round robin or Spil-over? What is the LB status when one line is down? It might be still up if you don't setup the Prob correctly. What Firmware we're talking about? --Michael@BWC
-
You can find the ping on Invesitigagte -> System Diagnostics. I assume your endpoints have the correct default gateway configured? Check the routing table on the firewall, it should list something like Source: Any, Destination: 0.0.0.0/0 to the proper gateway. Make sure there is no route which intercept the WAN desinted…
-
@cravix I assume you have the correct Access rules from LAN to WAN allowing traffic to pass? NAT and routing is setup properly? First diagnostics: ping from firewall to 8.8.8.8 works? ping from firewall to www.google.com works? ping from endpoint to 8.8.8.8 works? ping from endpoint to www.google.com works? These should…
-
@mrshahin I would presume when the lease expires should do the trick, but cannot say for sure for any kind of endpoint there is. --Michael@BWC
-
@mrshahin yes, this is what I tried to explain, change subnet of X0 and then configure the DHCP scope. But make sure that your clients will get a new DHCP lease as well, because they need to honor the subnet mask too. --Michael@BWC
-
The subnet mask of your DHCP scope should be already in sync with the related interface settings and the scope goes from 172.5.1.20 - 172.5.4.254 (or up to 172.5.7.254) ... 172.20.4.254 would be out of the subnet :) --Michael@BWC
-
@mrshahin I guess you did not changed the subnet mask of your network interface from 255.255.252.0 to 255.255.248.0? This causes this message. The DHCP scope will be automatically adjusted after giving the network interface the correct subnet mask. Tested on 6.5.4.10 a minute ago. --Michael@BWC
-
@umut great that you solved it, but I guess you misled us by this: We want to print over VPN to the Printer connected to the WLAN at home, and I could not solve this problem until now. I (as a non native english speaker) assumed that you needed to print from the company to the remote attached printer via VPN. But this…
-
@Eddy77 to the best of my knowledge, if somebody gets the installer and runs it, the Endpoint gets registered.. It's all part of the auto-registration. Maybe @SuroopMC has another take on this? --Michael@BWC
-
To best of my knowledge this can be only done via a Site-to-Site VPN Tunnel which requires some form of VPN gateway on the remote side. I'am not aware of any VPN client software which can provide this kind of functionality. I guess this is the only option if you really need to initiate the print connection from your…
-
@umut IMHO this will not be possible, because the IP address assigned to the printer is not known to the SMA and not part of the NetExtender Tunnel and therefore not routed. I suggest to use a VPN Tunnel for this kind of scenario instead of a simple Remote Access. --Michael@BWC
-
@Zyxian this was already answered in August 2021, upgrade to the latest Firmware, R906 is by far not the latest, check on MySonicWall, 7.0.1-5065 is the latest (and greatest so far). --Michael@BWC
-
@Kevin_Verbeek no that is not possible. If you really need this, look into Mikrotik and run a EoIP (Ethernet-over-IP) Tunnel behind your SonicWalls. --Michael@BWC