BWC Cybersecurity Overlord ✭✭✭
Reactions
Comments
-
Hi Jorge, running CC 3.0.11 on a mac Mini 2018 with macOS 10.15.4 myself, no major problems, only the SonicWallEnforcementService is acting strange. On my Mac Book I'am using it only from time to time, no probs there. But I'am rebooting my system daily, maybe the problem stacks up over time? Is any of the SonicWall…
-
Hi @jquintao what version of the OPSWAT database is installed on your system? Maybe it's an older version which does not list SentinelOne as Vendor? I did had trouble in the past sometimes to keep the database updated. --Michael@BWC
-
Hi, all good, I re-created the VPN policies, it's working as before. I'll keep this in mind if I need to upgrade a 6.5.4.4 system. --Michael@BWC
-
Hi @Nevyaditha I don't have a TSR, but I checked on another appliance running 6.5.4.4 and GroupVPN was selectable in the zone settings like you mentioned. I totally forgot about that in the 5+ months since 6.5.4.5 is available. So there is a fair chance that I disabled GroupVPN per zone, because I didn't need it.…
-
Hi @Nevyaditha GroupVPN can IMHO not be disabled per zone, but the GroupVPN policies were indeed disabled. It's not easy for me to recall the exact timeline, because it seems the problem persisted for a couple of days and the customer didn't reported it to me. I upgraded to 6.5.4.5 on May 4th (from 6.5.4.4) and exported…
-
Hi @Vendhan did you checked within the TSR for any clues? Search for "Misc : Watch Dog Task" in it, maybe it's triggered by the Watchdog, which causes a reboot per default (can changed in the internal settings). I'am not certain if there is still no possibility to figure out what causes a change from Primary to Secondary…
-
Just to keep the Community up to date, the Support Team is on it. Today my system started without any high CPU load for about 3 hours, Device Status was "Online and compliant" and switched for no obvious reason to Device Status "Connecting" and this was the point where the 100% CPU load started again. This seems to be…
-
Hi @djhurt1 you only need to bind the VPNs on the line you want, maybe for redundancy reasons you could use multiple VPN connections to each WAN interface. Or you could distribute the VPN connections over all WAN interfaces for performance reasons. --Michael@BWC
-
Hi Suroop, opened as #43407647 a minute ago. I'am kinda curious what caused this. Take care. --Michael@BWC
-
Meow ... can't wait :) Stay safe. --Michael@BWC
-
Hi @shiprasahu93 thanks for pointing out the obvious, I was of course aware of this, but it does not really help, this would just mean browse through a whole category/sub-category just to find what I'am looking for. Maybe the search can be enhanced for that matter. --Michael@BWC
-
Hi @Vijay_Kumar_KV this is not Radius related, but never mind, all hands are on deck, Sales is informed and @Chris jumped on it as well. --Michael@BWC
-
The results of my further testings are inconclusive. It seems that it is somewhat related to the endpoint if the Device ID differs between SMAConnectAgent Versions. I tested with Agent 1.1.25 (10.0.0.3), 1.1.27 (10.2.0.0) and 1.1.29 (10.2.0.1) and for my Windows PC the Device ID was always the same. But for another system…
-
It's still valid for 10.2.0.1, can you please give me the DTS for the fixed issues so I can references it in my case, it was not mentioned in 9.0.7 Release Notes? --Michael@BWC
-
Hi @Vijay_Kumar_KV if I get you right, you're saying admin rights are not needed for upgrades? This does not seem to be the case, after logging into the SMA I'am greeted with an option to upgrade the SMAConnectAgent because there is a newer version available, when I'am hitting yes to upgrade I'am asked for Admin…